Re: What is missing from Git v2.0

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 24, 2014, 08:23 UTC
Message-ID: <5358ca1a55a69_1f7b143d3101c@nysa.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <877g6fb2h6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>

David Kastrup wrote:

Show 19 quoted lines

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > James Denholm wrote:
> >> Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> >This is a false dichotomy; there aren't just two kinds
> >> > of Git users.
> >> >
> >> > There is such a category of Git users who are not
> >> > fresh-out-of-the-boat, yet not power users either.
> >> 
> >> Oh, I didn't mean to suggest a dichotomy of any kind. However these are the
> >> two groups (I suggest) are the most immediately relevant - one calls for
> >> change, and the other would be negatively impacted.
> >
> > Nobody would be negatively impacted. Who would be impacted negatively
> > by having default aliases?
> 
> The people having to read and understand scripts written in the
> expectation of default aliases.

Which are imaginary.

> > And I have showed they are not problems.
> 
> You managed to convince yourself, so feel free to put aliases in every
> Git you use and distribute.

There is evidence for the claim that there won't be those problems. You have absolutely no evidence there there will.

-- 
Felipe Contreras