From: David Kastrup Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:01:29 GMT Subject: Re: What is missing from Git v2.0 Message-ID: <8738h3ayom.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <5358ca1a55a69_1f7b143d3101c@nysa.notmuch> Felipe Contreras writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> Felipe Contreras writes: >> >> > James Denholm wrote: >> >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> >This is a false dichotomy; there aren't just two kinds >> >> > of Git users. >> >> > >> >> > There is such a category of Git users who are not >> >> > fresh-out-of-the-boat, yet not power users either. >> >> >> >> Oh, I didn't mean to suggest a dichotomy of any kind. However these are the >> >> two groups (I suggest) are the most immediately relevant - one calls for >> >> change, and the other would be negatively impacted. >> > >> > Nobody would be negatively impacted. Who would be impacted negatively >> > by having default aliases? >> >> The people having to read and understand scripts written in the >> expectation of default aliases. > > Which are imaginary. And I prefer them to stay that way since then one does not need to worry about them. >> > And I have showed they are not problems. >> >> You managed to convince yourself, so feel free to put aliases in >> every Git you use and distribute. > > There is evidence for the claim that there won't be those > problems. You have absolutely no evidence there there will. As I said: you managed to convince yourself and may milk that for all that it's worth. -- David Kastrup