Re: What is missing from Git v2.0

From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Date: Apr 24, 2014, 07:39 UTC
Message-ID: <877g6fb2h6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <5358bae8ab550_1f7b143d31037@nysa.notmuch>

Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:

Show 14 quoted lines

> James Denholm wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >This is a false dichotomy; there aren't just two kinds
>> > of Git users.
>> >
>> > There is such a category of Git users who are not
>> > fresh-out-of-the-boat, yet not power users either.
>> 
>> Oh, I didn't mean to suggest a dichotomy of any kind. However these are the
>> two groups (I suggest) are the most immediately relevant - one calls for
>> change, and the other would be negatively impacted.
>
> Nobody would be negatively impacted. Who would be impacted negatively
> by having default aliases?

The people having to read and understand scripts written in the expectation of default aliases.

> And I have showed they are not problems.

You managed to convince yourself, so feel free to put aliases in every Git you use and distribute.

-- 
David Kastrup