Re: git-format-patch possible regressions
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- May 25, 2006, 23:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy7wpr97n.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0605260014340.13003@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> Thinking about this again, it makes more sense not to imply --numbered:
Yes, that makes sense. That way you can say "Please start naming the output files at 0032-xxxx.txt, because you gave me 31 patch series last time, but I do not want [PATCH x/y] on the subject line, just [PATCH]".
That brings up another issue. Don't we need to have another option --total-number that overrides the /y part above?
Hmm...