From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:11:24 GMT
Subject: Re: git-format-patch possible regressions
Message-ID: <7vy7wpr97n.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0605260014340.13003@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> Thinking about this again, it makes more sense not to imply --numbered:

Yes, that makes sense.  That way you can say "Please start
naming the output files at 0032-xxxx.txt, because you gave me 31
patch series last time, but I do not want [PATCH x/y] on the
subject line, just [PATCH]".

That brings up another issue.  Don't we need to have another
option --total-number that overrides the /y part above?

Hmm...