Re: [PATCH] whatchanged: document its historical nature
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 9, 2013, 20:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vtxiy4m6o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130809201447.GH2337@serenity.lan>
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> +New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead. The >> +`whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1] >> +run with different defaults that shows a --raw diff outputat the > > s/outputat/output at/
Thanks.
Show 5 quoted lines
> Although I wonder if it would be better to say > > New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead. The > `whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1] > with the `--raw` option specified.
But that is different from the truth, no? "git whatchanged -p" will not behave as if "git whatchanged -p" with the "--raw" specified. The 'raw' kicks in only as a default.