From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:57:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] whatchanged: document its historical nature
Message-ID: <7vtxiy4m6o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130809201447.GH2337@serenity.lan>

John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes:

>> +New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead.  The
>> +`whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1]
>> +run with different defaults that shows a --raw diff outputat the
>
> s/outputat/output at/

Thanks.

> Although I wonder if it would be better to say
>
>     New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead.  The
>     `whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1]
>     with the `--raw` option specified.

But that is different from the truth, no?  "git whatchanged -p" will
not behave as if "git whatchanged -p" with the "--raw" specified.
The 'raw' kicks in only as a default.