Re: Remove old forgotten command: whatchanged
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Aug 8, 2013, 15:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqfvukdy39.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0kTfQYZG8R1EMuV37pdJ-aj9btXmfJ1Fb4QoMeZ1QucAw@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote: >> The only thing it does is to scratch an irrelevant itch by people >> who peek the codebase and find an old command whose existence does >> not even hurt them. They may have too much time on their hand, but >> that is not an excuse to waste other people's time by adding extra >> makework on our plate, or changing the behaviour for people who use >> the command without explanation. > > It's a maintenance burden
I'm not really worried about the maintainance of a 20-lines long function ...
> that confuses users.
... but I do agree that the doc is really confusing. It would be much better if the doc could be reduced to:
"This is a synonym for linkgit:git-log[1] --raw --some --other ---options. Please refer to the documentation of that command."
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/