Re: [PATCH 1/3] retain reflogs for deleted refs
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 16, 2012, 23:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr4r6xvom.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vy5mftm3q.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I like the general direction. Perhaps a long distant future > direction could be to also use the same trick in the ref namespace > so that we can have 'next' branch itself, and 'next/foo', 'next/bar' > forks that are based on the 'next' branch at the same time (it > obviously is a totally unrelated topic)?
I notice that I was responsible for making this topic veer in the wrong direction by bringing up a new feature "having 'next' and 'next/bar' at the same time" which nobody asked. Perhaps we can drop that for now to simplify the scope of the topic, to bring the log graveyard back on track?