Re: [PATCH 1/3] retain reflogs for deleted refs
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jul 26, 2012, 16:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpq8ve6qxui.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <10DD3DE0-E554-4BE3-A20B-FDBC73219646@gmail.com>
Alexey Muranov <alexey.muranov@gmail.com> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On 26 Jul 2012, at 14:47, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > >> So we haven't found any way to present both branches "foo" and >> "foo/bar" on file system at the same time. How about when we a new >> branch introduces such a conflict, we push the new branch directly to >> packed-refs? If we need either of them on a separate file, for fast >> update for example, then we unpack just one and repack all refs that >> conflict with it. Attempting to update two conflict branches in >> parallel may impact performance, but I don't think that happens often. >> -- >> Duy > > How about simply deprecating "/" in branch name?
Err, it's not like nobody's using this feature (Junio does a heavy use of it in particular) ...
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/