From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:29:29 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] retain reflogs for deleted refs
Message-ID: <7vr4r6xvom.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vy5mftm3q.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> I like the general direction.  Perhaps a long distant future
> direction could be to also use the same trick in the ref namespace
> so that we can have 'next' branch itself, and 'next/foo', 'next/bar'
> forks that are based on the 'next' branch at the same time (it
> obviously is a totally unrelated topic)?

I notice that I was responsible for making this topic veer in the
wrong direction by bringing up a new feature "having 'next' and
'next/bar' at the same time" which nobody asked.  Perhaps we can
drop that for now to simplify the scope of the topic, to bring the
log graveyard back on track?