Re: [PATCH 0/4] Makefile fixes
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 6, 2010, 01:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vpr5onir5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100101090556.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> writes:
> Junio, could you tell us what happened to this thread? > > Makefile improvements. No discussion.
I took 4/4, and after looking at them again, I think 2/4 looks sensible, too.
I was puzzled by 3/4 and I still am; the dependency rules are the same for %.o and %.s yet the patch changes only %.s. Either it leaves the same breakage for %.o (which is much more important in practice), or the problem Jonathan has with %.s may have other causes, but it was unclear to me.