From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:07:26 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Makefile fixes
Message-ID: <7vpr5onir5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100101090556.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>

Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> writes:

> Junio, could you tell us what happened to this thread?
>
> Makefile improvements.  No discussion.

I took 4/4, and after looking at them again, I think 2/4 looks sensible,
too.

I was puzzled by 3/4 and I still am; the dependency rules are the same for
%.o and %.s yet the patch changes only %.s.  Either it leaves the same
breakage for %.o (which is much more important in practice), or the
problem Jonathan has with %.s may have other causes, but it was unclear to
me.