Re: [PATCH 2/7] push: describe --porcelain just like commit and status
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2011, 19:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vmxlys89t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <3b6a87b585eea1722bd31bc9cf5ba2c80e37aefa.1297695910.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
> - OPT_BIT( 0, "porcelain", &flags, "machine-readable output", TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN), > + OPT_BIT( 0, "porcelain", &flags, "show porcelain output format", TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN),
Thanks, but I wonder if machine-readable is more descriptive than "porcelain output format", iow, updating commit/status may be better.
The option was meant to mean "output format for Porcelain script writers to stay machine readable" but it can be misunderstood as "output format a Porcelain command would produce with chromes and glitters".