From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:53:02 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] push: describe --porcelain just like commit and status
Message-ID: <7vmxlys89t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <3b6a87b585eea1722bd31bc9cf5ba2c80e37aefa.1297695910.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net>

Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:

> -		OPT_BIT( 0,  "porcelain", &flags, "machine-readable output", TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN),
> +		OPT_BIT( 0,  "porcelain", &flags, "show porcelain output format", TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN),

Thanks, but I wonder if machine-readable is more descriptive than
"porcelain output format", iow, updating commit/status may be better.

The option was meant to mean "output format for Porcelain script writers
to stay machine readable" but it can be misunderstood as "output format
a Porcelain command would produce with chromes and glitters".