Re: [PATCH 2/7] push: describe --porcelain just like commit and status
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2011, 22:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTintLstPrvs_AqCixmXzRcrthfy+qAaPmve2oSu-@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmxlys89t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Heya,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 20:53, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> The option was meant to mean "output format for Porcelain script writers > to stay machine readable" but it can be misunderstood as "output format > a Porcelain command would produce with chromes and glitters".
I've always thought this to be a rather awkward option name. If it had been named '--plumbing' there'd be no room for such misunderstanding, it outputs it a format suitable for use by, and as plumbing. Perhaps something to remember for the future, or would we want to stay consistent with the current --porcelain?
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier