Re: [PATCH] gc: call "prune --expire 2.weeks.ago"
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Yes.
>
> In any case, most likely these objects would have been packed anyway
> during that period, so they would have been pruned by the repack called by
> git-gc.
Yes, that is the most probable way for these unused cruft to get removed.
Show 5 quoted lines
> My patch really, really is about _unreferenced_ loose objects, i.e.
> something you get by multiple "git add"s without commits. And by merge
> conflicts.
>
> IOW by objects that were never referenced by commit objects.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>