From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:54:20 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Support triangular workflows Message-ID: <7vhajvv51f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130328153547.GA3337@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Sometimes it's annoyingly verbose to break down a compound function. But > I think in this case, you can make your tests more robust by just > checking the affirmative that the ref is still where we expect it to be, > like: > > check_push_result up_repo $the_first_commit heads/master > > Sorry if that was a bit long-winded. I think that practically speaking, > it is not a likely source of problems in this case. But it's an > anti-pattern in our tests that I think is worth mentioning. Thanks. That is one of the reasons why we do not want to see too many custom test helper functions.