Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Git commit --patch (again)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 9, 2011, 16:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vei47q0i6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110509144451.GA11362@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> I'm not sure if it is worth caring about. If you are really interested > in index state, you are probably better off using "git add -p" and "git > commit" separately.
I agree with this. I do not foresee myself using "commit -p" ever for this exact reason. I however didn't see anything wrong in the series and I do not see any reason to reject it, either. It's just another long rope other people can use to tangle their neck with ;-).
> Hmm. Test t7501.8 explicitly tests that this isn't allowed. But the test > is poorly written, and falsely returns success even with your patch.
Thanks. Let me see if I can simply amend what I queued already ;-)