Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Git commit --patch (again)
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 9, 2011, 22:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110509220806.GC3719@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vei47q0i6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:53:05AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I agree with this. I do not foresee myself using "commit -p" ever for this > exact reason. I however didn't see anything wrong in the series and I do > not see any reason to reject it, either. It's just another long rope other > people can use to tangle their neck with ;-).
Heh. Maybe your title should be "Git Hangman". :)
> > Hmm. Test t7501.8 explicitly tests that this isn't allowed. But the test > > is poorly written, and falsely returns success even with your patch. > > Thanks. Let me see if I can simply amend what I queued already ;-)
It's unfortunately not quite as simple as having that test succeed, as it changes state that breaks later tests. I didn't investigate deeply, though.
-Peff