Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2010, 20:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vbpfy9nt4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4B71B574.3010609@web.de>
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> >> We _can_ start experimenting with an option (similar to "checkout -m"), >> which does: >> > > Does the documentation need any improvements on the dependencies between > the mentioned subfunctions?
Sorry, you lost me. I did say and still think that it would be good to have in the documentation a separate section that teaches the users what happens to their uncommitted changes when checking out a different branch (or an unnamed branch). But I am at loss guessing what dependencies among what "subfunctions" you are talking about.