Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Feb 18, 2010, 20:09 UTC
Message-ID: <7vaav6b925.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B7D7C5E.7060807@web.de>

Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> writes:

Show 5 quoted lines

>> I did say and still think that it would be good to have in the documentation 
>> a separate section that teaches the users what happens to their uncommitted 
>> changes when checking out a different branch (or an unnamed branch).
>
> How are the chances to achieve progress on this issue?

How would _I_ know? It depends on the probability of somebody who cares about improving the documentation having enough time and motivation to do the actual work, and submitting the patch. It also depends on the quality of the result.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.