From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:06:15 GMT Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing Message-ID: <7vbpfy9nt4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <4B71B574.3010609@web.de> Markus Elfring writes: >> >> We _can_ start experimenting with an option (similar to "checkout -m"), >> which does: >> > > Does the documentation need any improvements on the dependencies between > the mentioned subfunctions? Sorry, you lost me. I did say and still think that it would be good to have in the documentation a separate section that teaches the users what happens to their uncommitted changes when checking out a different branch (or an unnamed branch). But I am at loss guessing what dependencies among what "subfunctions" you are talking about.