Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing

From: Markus Elfring <markus.elfring@web.de>
Date: Mar 3, 2010, 15:55 UTC
Message-ID: <4B8E8677.8060003@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <7vvdde62ai.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

> Traditionally the right way to do this has been to make a temporary commit
> on the branch, i.e.

I would like to avoid such commits for unfinished content updates. Should the storage operation be provided by the stash instead for intermediate work results? Will it happen to forget corresponding clean-up for "temporary" changes that might be committed too early just to get them stored?

Regards, Markus

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.