Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing
- From
- Markus Elfring <markus.elfring@web.de>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2010, 19:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4B71B574.3010609@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhbq0wuy6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
> > We _can_ start experimenting with an option (similar to "checkout -m"), > which does: >
Does the documentation need any improvements on the dependencies between the mentioned subfunctions? Would we like to collect further ideas on the suggested issue?
Regards, Markus