Re: [PATCH 00/15] Hierarchical reference cache (once again)
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 07:30:12AM +0200, mhagger@alum.mit.edu wrote:
>
>> Michael Haggerty (15):
>> refs.c: reorder definitions more logically
>> ...
>
> I read through the whole series and didn't find anything noticeably
> wrong. Overall, it was quite readable for such a large series. Thanks
> for breaking it up as you did.
I hate myself doing this, but...
<aol> me too! </aol>
The series looked very readable, unlike the previous huge rounds.
Thanks.