Re: [PATCHv4] rebase [-i --exec | -ix] <CMD>...
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 12, 2012, 20:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v4nqgjmu6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4FD790AF.5070108@kdbg.org>
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
> Checking the usage blurb rather than the error message even has > advantages: it is immune to changes of the error messages and to i18n > poisoning.
Yes, to a degree. There is no guarantee that the error message stays on a single line in a particular l10n ;-).
> In this light, the version you have queued is fine.