Re: [PATCH 0/5] Documentation/git-diff.txt improvements
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 29, 2013, 16:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v38u9l2jk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0nVZHwSMS_gtisiAguNhAMnDpdWmAtz_OgzP93YZtYfHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> So, I decided to drop everything and just submit the first two parts. > Until we can decide what to do about the '<commit>..<commit>' and > '<commit>...<commit>' forms (new rev spec? overload existing rev spec > to change the meaning? deprecate without a viable alternative?), let's > leave them as it is.
I had an impression that many of them, with the suggested fix-ups, were improvements, with or without the A~B discussion. It seems that the entire review wasted many braincycles if you are to drop the ball at this point, which is very dissapointing.
> Nothing to resubmit. Junio: can you just queue the first two parts?
I do not appreciate "Nothing to resubmit". [1/5] needs fixes to the issue Jonathan pointed out, doesn't it?