From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:33:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Documentation/git-diff.txt improvements
Message-ID: <7v38u9l2jk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0nVZHwSMS_gtisiAguNhAMnDpdWmAtz_OgzP93YZtYfHQ@mail.gmail.com>

Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:

> So, I decided to drop everything and just submit the first two parts.
> Until we can decide what to do about the '<commit>..<commit>' and
> '<commit>...<commit>' forms (new rev spec? overload existing rev spec
> to change the meaning? deprecate without a viable alternative?), let's
> leave them as it is.

I had an impression that many of them, with the suggested fix-ups,
were improvements, with or without the A~B discussion.  It seems
that the entire review wasted many braincycles if you are to drop
the ball at this point, which is very dissapointing.

> Nothing to resubmit.  Junio: can you just queue the first two parts?

I do not appreciate "Nothing to resubmit".  [1/5] needs fixes to the
issue Jonathan pointed out, doesn't it?