Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] am/rebase: share read_author_script()
- From
- Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net>
- Date
- Oct 26, 2018, 09:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <55a2a458-c71e-0018-5fd7-b66e349ddb3d@talktalk.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqtvlah052.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio
On 25/10/2018 09:59, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> writes: > >> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> >> >> Thanks to Eric for his feedback on v1. I've rerolled based on >> that. Patches 1 & 2 are new and try to address some of the concerns >> Eric raised, particularly the error handling for a badly edited author >> script. See the notes on patches 4 & 5 for the changes to those (they >> were previously 2 & 3). > > I spotted a weird corner case buglet, but it seems that this one is > ready for 'next' even without fixing that "give it three times and > we will happily continue" thing.
Well spotted on the corner case. If you're happy to hold off on moving it to next I can send a re-roll with fixes for that next week or I can do it as a fixup if you want to move this forward now.
> Do we know of any other issues? Can we now move it forward?
I don't know of any other issues but I don't think anyone else has looked at this iteration. Thanks for taking a look at these.
Best Wishes
Phillip
> Thanks. >