Re: [PATCH] subtree/Makefile: Standardize (esp. for packagers)
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2014, 19:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5365420874947_27397d32f016@nysa.notmuch>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAHYYfeGNO5QknoKkZfYy3XLNRZsVmf0WjeNGkDxH3QwPF-RsUQ@mail.gmail.com>
James Denholm wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@miniinfo.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:35:13PM +1000, James Denholm wrote: > >> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote: > > Agreed. It also doesn't help that when subtree patches are proposed > > (especially new features instead of obvious bugs), there often seems > > to be little or no feedback from anyone. > > > > -------- > > Depending on how much time you have: > > > > This may be outside the scope of work you were planning on, > > While current, immediate focus is really just getting the makefile fixed > up and hopefully then have more people package subtree by default, > overall I'll very likely extend that to general work on subtree and such.
I think you should take a look at the Makefile of contrib/remote-helpers. I bet something simple like that would work just fine for subtree.
-- Felipe Contreras