Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] http: rename HTTP_REAUTH to HTTP_RETRY
- From
- Nelson Benitez Leon <nelsonjesus.benitez@seap.minhap.es>
- Date
- Mar 14, 2012, 11:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4F607CEF.5010209@seap.minhap.es>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1uowt83u.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
After adding the proxy authentication support in http, the semantics of HTTP_REAUTH changed more to a retry rather than a re-authentication, so we rename it to HTTP_AUTH_RETRY.
Signed-off-by: Nelson Benitez Leon <nbenitezl@gmail.com> --- Ok this is a new 5/5 patch that have HTTP_AUTH_RETRY as Junio suggested, is responding with this patch good or do I need to send a new re-roll just for this?
thanks,
http.c | 6 +++--- http.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/http.c b/http.c index 12dcaa1..7468cdb 100644 --- a/http.c +++ b/http.c @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int http_request(const char *url, void *result, int target, int options) } else { credential_fill(&http_auth); init_curl_http_auth(slot->curl); - ret = HTTP_REAUTH; + ret = HTTP_AUTH_RETRY; } } else if (results.http_code == 407) { /* Proxy authentication failure */ if (proxy_auth.username && proxy_auth.password) { @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static int http_request(const char *url, void *result, int target, int options) } else { credential_fill(&proxy_auth); set_proxy_auth(slot->curl); - ret = HTTP_REAUTH; + ret = HTTP_AUTH_RETRY; } } else { if (!curl_errorstr[0]) @@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static int http_request_reauth(const char *url, void *result, int target, do { ret = http_request(url, result, target, options); - } while (ret == HTTP_REAUTH); + } while (ret == HTTP_AUTH_RETRY); return ret; } diff --git a/http.h b/http.h index 303eafb..6e3ea59 100644 --- a/http.h +++ b/http.h @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ extern char *get_remote_object_url(const char *url, const char *hex, #define HTTP_MISSING_TARGET 1 #define HTTP_ERROR 2 #define HTTP_START_FAILED 3 -#define HTTP_REAUTH 4 +#define HTTP_AUTH_RETRY 4 #define HTTP_NOAUTH 5 /*
-- 1.7.7.6