Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] branch: introduce --list option
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Sep 9, 2011, 19:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4E6A691C.2060803@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vlitxvh45.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 09.09.2011 18:02:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: > >> Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 08.09.2011 23:17: >>> Ah, nevermind. >>> >>> As the series is already in 'next', here is what I came up with. >> >> I thought you'll rebuild next anyways after 1.7.7, but either way it's >> fine. Thanks for holding this series in next long enough to really cook >> it (and Jeff for revisiting it), it's much better now, keeping the >> (undocumented, but expected) behavior of "git branch -v foo". > > Thank *you* for all the work. > > I recall Peff had some comments on your new tests last night, by the way. >
Yes, we have tests (now) for "-v -d", "-v -m", "-v branch*" and combinations with --list. Testing "-v foo" for creation would be good (and belong into t3200). Is there anything to amend?
Michael