Re: [PATCHv2 2/5] git-tag: introduce long forms for the options
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Aug 28, 2011, 14:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4E5A4AC2.5000908@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpqjsdrnp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 26.08.2011 19:11:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: > >> Long forms are better to memoize, and more reliably uniform across >> commands. > > I think people "memorize" and machines "memoize"; machines will do so just > fine without long forms, but I think you are talking about helping people.
Yep.
> The part after ", and" lacks a verb, making it a non-sentence.
They are better to memorize, and they are more reliably uniform... Maybe drop the comma?
Show 10 quoted lines
> >> Design notes: >> >> -u,--local-user is named following the analogous gnupg option. >> >> -l,--list is not an argument taking option but a mode switch. > > Ok. > > The remainder looks good. Thanks.