Re: [RFC] branch: list branches by single remote
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Aug 24, 2011, 15:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4E551AD0.7050702@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <4E551548.9090807@elegosoft.com>
Michael Schubert venit, vidit, dixit 24.08.2011 17:14:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On 08/16/2011 05:14 PM, Jeff King wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:37:33PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: >> >>>> This isn't right. You are assuming that a remote called "foo" will have >>>> all of its branches in refs/remotes/foo. That's true under the default >>>> configuration, but technically speaking, the remote tracking branches of >>>> "foo" are defined by the right-hand side of foo's fetch refspecs. >>> >>> You are 100% right here, but... >>> >>>> So I think you want something more like this: >>> >>> ...the op still might want to filter simply by the remote name. >> >> That is a perfectly reasonable approach. It just should be called >> "--glob" or something, and not "remote". git-tag allows patterns to an >> explicit "tag -l", but "-l" is already taken for git-branch. > > As suggested, I've just called it "--glob" for now.
Well, again, what's the point in replicating
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/172228
and how is it different?
As I've mentioned, I've been in the middle of polishing that up. You can follow it if you like:
http://repo.or.cz/w/git/mjg.git/shortlog/refs/heads/branch-list-pattern
Also, again: git branch is much more like git tag than it is like git log, so I think the pattern matching options should be, too.
Michael