From: Michael J Gruber Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:29:32 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] branch: introduce --list option Message-ID: <4E6A691C.2060803@drmicha.warpmail.net> In-Reply-To: <7vlitxvh45.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 09.09.2011 18:02: > Michael J Gruber writes: > >> Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 08.09.2011 23:17: >>> Ah, nevermind. >>> >>> As the series is already in 'next', here is what I came up with. >> >> I thought you'll rebuild next anyways after 1.7.7, but either way it's >> fine. Thanks for holding this series in next long enough to really cook >> it (and Jeff for revisiting it), it's much better now, keeping the >> (undocumented, but expected) behavior of "git branch -v foo". > > Thank *you* for all the work. > > I recall Peff had some comments on your new tests last night, by the way. > Yes, we have tests (now) for "-v -d", "-v -m", "-v branch*" and combinations with --list. Testing "-v foo" for creation would be good (and belong into t3200). Is there anything to amend? Michael