Re: [PATCH 0/6] unit-tests: add and use TEST_RUN to simplify tests

From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 11, 2024, 10:05 UTC
Message-ID: <38c962cd-2691-4664-b262-6eb78b8a61b5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy168uc8i.fsf@gitster.g>

On 10/07/2024 23:13, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines

> René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:
>
> So, looking back the discussion list on
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/git/85b6b8a9-ee5f-42ab-bcbc-49976b30ef33@web.de/
> 
> any loose ends still need to be addressed?  I didn't spot any
> myself, so I am willing to merge it to 'next' soonish, but please
> stop me if there were something I missed.

I thought René was planning a re-roll to avoid using xstrfmt() in Patch 2 c.f <97390954-49bc-48c4-bab1-95be10717aca@web.de>. Also I'm not sure we've reached a conclusion on whether to include the "if" in the macro or require the user to write "if(TEST_RUN(...))". My impression is that there is a consensus building around having the macro include the "if" but we haven't decided what to call it c.f. <62d221cc-532a-4a6d-8e96-b5a246ddeb1b@web.de>

Best Wishes

Phillip