Re: [GSoC][PATCH 0/2] rebase -i: rewrite append_todo_help() in C
- From
Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 31, 2018, 19:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2bf2d178-d286-c566-f68e-79c70fe66dbf@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kZ7HiyZTS40XPwpjN3PBbdW0ETN=dfzeE-90Rp+irXnSA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Stefan,
Le 31/05/2018 à 20:44, Stefan Beller a écrit :
Show 27 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Phillip Wood > <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> wrote: >> Hi Alban, it's great to see you working on this >> >> On 31/05/18 12:01, Alban Gruin wrote: >>> This series rewrites append_todo_help() from shell to C. This is part >>> of the effort to rewrite interactive rebase in C. >>> >>> The first commit rewrites append_todo_help() in C (the C version >>> covers a bit more than the old shell version), adds some parameters to >>> rebase--helper, etc. >> >> I've had a read of the first patch and I think it looks fine, my only >> comment would be that the help for '--edit-todo' is a bit misleading at >> the moment as currently it's just a flag to tell rebase-helper that the >> todo list is being edited rather than actually implementing the >> functionality to edit the list (but hopefully that will follow in the >> future). > > Would you have better suggestions for the name of the flag? > Of the top of my head: > --write-edit-todo > --hint-todo-edit > --include-todo-edit-hint > not sure I like these names, though they seem to reflect the > nature of that flag a little bit better. >
As my next patch series will probably be about rewriting edit-todo in C, do you really think I should rename the flag?
Show 5 quoted lines
> If you feel strongly, I'd rather see Alban drop this second patch and > move on instead of waiting for our argument to settle. ( I do not feel > strongly about it, but put it out as a suggestion as that seemed like > it would lead to a better end state for the project). >
Okay, so I drop this patch and reroll the other?
Cheers, Alban