[PATCH 04/10] t-reftable-block: use reftable_record_key() instead of strbuf_addstr()
- From
- Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 14, 2024, 12:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20240814121122.4642-5-chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20240814121122.4642-1-chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
In the current testing setup, the record key required for many block iterator functions is manually stored in a strbuf struct and then passed to these functions. This is not ideal when there exists a dedicated function to encode a record's key into a strbuf, namely reftable_record_key(). Use this function instead of manual encoding.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com> --- t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c index baeb9c8b07..0d73fb98d6 100644 --- a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c +++ b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c @@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ static void t_block_read_write(void) for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { struct block_iter it = BLOCK_ITER_INIT; - strbuf_reset(&want); - strbuf_addstr(&want, recs[i].u.ref.refname); + reftable_record_key(&recs[i], &want); n = block_iter_seek_key(&it, &br, &want); check_int(n, ==, 0);
-- 2.45.GIT