Re: [PATCH v6 16/21] mingw: try to work around issues with the test cleanup

> Hi Ævar,
> 
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 19 2021, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > >> On Tue, Jan 29 2019, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> > >> >
> > >> > It seems that every once in a while in the Git for Windows SDK, there
> > >> > are some transient file locking issues preventing the test clean up to
> > >> > delete the trash directory. Let's be gentle and try again five seconds
> > >> > later, and only error out if it still fails the second time.
> > >> >
> > >> > This change helps Windows, and does not hurt any other platform
> > >> > (normally, it is highly unlikely that said deletion fails, and if it
> > >> > does, normally it will fail again even 5 seconds later).
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> > >> > ---
> > >> >  t/test-lib.sh | 6 +++++-
> > >> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
> > >> > index f31a1c8f79..9c0ca5effb 100644
> > >> > --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> > >> > +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> > >> > @@ -1104,7 +1104,11 @@ test_done () {
> > >> >  			error "Tests passed but trash directory already removed before test cleanup; aborting"
> > >> >
> > >> >  			cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/.." &&
> > >> > -			rm -fr "$TRASH_DIRECTORY" ||
> > >> > +			rm -fr "$TRASH_DIRECTORY" || {
> > >> > +				# try again in a bit
> > >> > +				sleep 5;
> > >> > +				rm -fr "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"
> > >> > +			} ||
> > >> >  			error "Tests passed but test cleanup failed; aborting"
> > >> >  		fi
> > >> >  		test_at_end_hook_
> > >>
> > >> I saw this sleep while reading some test-lib.sh code, doesn't this break
> > >> df4c0d1a79 (test-lib: abort when can't remove trash directory,
> > >> 2017-04-20) for non-Windows platforms?
> > >
> > > It does not really break it, it just delays the inevitable failure.
> 
> I still think this is the best answer to this (implicit) question:
> 
> > In any case, your patch clearly undoes whatever canary for gc issues
> > df4c0d1a792 was trying to put into the test-lib, but didn't say so in
> > its commit message.
> 
> I was not _really_ paying attention to that commit when I implemented the
> work-around you mentioned above. At the same time I think it does _not_
> undo the canary. If the trash directory cannot be removed via `rm -fr`,
> and if that is an indicator for something fishy going on, chances are that
> the second `rm -fr` a couple seconds later will _also_ fail, and we still
> get that error message.
> 
> The only reason why the second `rm` should succeed, at least that I can
> think of, is that something on Windows blocked those files from being
> deleted, and it is no longer blocking after a couple seconds, and that
> usually means that an anti-malware scanned those files.