Re: [PATCH 00/16] Consolidate reachability logic
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 16, 2018, 18:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180716185618.GD22298@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cTVP2kubTEZBms_x1FvnqjGcX3pjTRXfjBMfMtdpbJt=Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:40:21PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:18 PM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:54:38PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > > This is not your problem, but I find these GitGitGadget > > > submissions somewhat annoying. This series has been spewed > > > all over my in-box in, what I assume, is commit date order. > > > > > > So, patches #4,5 dated 19/06, then #1,2,3 dated 25/06, > > > then #15 dated 28/06, then #6,7 dated 12/07, then #8-16 > > > dated 13/07, then 00/16 dated today. > > > > Yeah, they're out of order in mutt's threaded display. And the > > back-dating means there's a much higher chance of them getting blocked > > as spam (e.g., some of the dates are from weeks ago). > > > > git-send-email uses the current time minus an offset, and then > > monotonically increases for each patch: > > Junio pointed this out to gitgitgadget developers in [1], which led to > an issue being opened[2]. That issue was merged today. > > [1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqq7em7gg3j.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/ > [2]: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/gitgitgadget/pull/15
I was going to say "oh good, fixed", but it looks like it just merged adding that line to the TODO list. :)
Still, it looks like wheels are in motion, which is nice.
-Peff