Re: [PATCH] run-command.c: print env vars when GIT_TRACE is set
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 11, 2018, 10:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180111100734.GA17274@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180110104835.22905-1-pclouds@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 05:48:35PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Occasionally submodule code could execute new commands with GIT_DIR set > to some submodule. GIT_TRACE prints just the command line which makes it > hard to tell that it's not really executed on this repository. > > Print env variables in this case. Note that the code deliberately ignore > variables unsetting because there are so many of them (to keep git > environment clean for the next process) and really hard to read.
I like this, and I'm pretty sure it would have helped me debug at least once in the past. I did notice one funny thing, though I think it was largely there before.
The output for a single command is pretty shell-like due to the quoting:
$ GIT_TRACE=1 ./git upload-pack . >/dev/null [...]run_command: 'git-upload-pack' '.'
You could copy and paste that to a shell if you wanted. And with environment variables, that remains so:
$ GIT_TRACE=1 ./git ls-remote https://github.com/git/git >/dev/null [...]run_command: 'GIT_DIR=.git' 'git-remote-https' 'https://[...]'
But if we're actually running a command via the shell, it all gets quoted as one argument:
$ GIT_TRACE=1 GIT_PAGER='foo | bar' ./git log [...]run_command: 'LV=-c' 'foo | bar'
which is kind of weird, as that's not something that can be run in a shell. This isn't introduced by your patch at all, but I noticed it more because of the shell-like environment variable output.
We actually used to print a separate:
exec: /bin/sh -c 'foo | bar'
line when we invoked a shell, which would arguably be the right place to show the env variables for such a case. But that went away with 3967e25be1 (run-command: prepare command before forking, 2017-04-19).
I think it might be helpful if we added back in "/bin/sh -c" to the run_command line when "use_shell" is in effect (and when we're not doing our "skip the shell" trickery). But that's totally orthogonal to your patch.
And anyway, it's just tracing output, so I don't think it's incredibly important either way. It was just something I noticed while looking at your patch's output.
-Peff