Re: [PATCH 4/7] convert less-trivial versions of "write_in_full() != len"

> The prior commit converted many sites to check the return
> value of write_in_full() for negativity, rather than a
> mismatch with the input length. This patch covers similar
> cases, but where the return value is stored in an
> intermediate variable. These should get the same treatment,
> but they need to be reviewed more carefully since it would
> be a bug if the return value is stored in an unsigned type
> (which indeed, it is in one of the cases).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
>  entry.c              | 5 +++--
>  refs/files-backend.c | 2 +-
>  streaming.c          | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)