Re: [PATCH v2] config: avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) < len" pattern

From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2017, 15:15 UTC
Message-ID: <0aa64f62-4acc-4235-d7c4-efb5986699fc@ramsayjones.plus.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170915003754.wlckhuwcftyc32de@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On 15/09/17 01:37, Jeff King wrote:

Show 12 quoted lines

> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:31:38AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> 
>> I just tried it again tonight; the current master branch has 3532
>> warnings when compiled with -Wextra, 1409 of which are -Wsign-compare
>> warnings. After applying the patch below, those numbers are reduced
>> by 344 to 3188/1065.
> 
> I'd love it if we were clean on -Wextra. My big question is many
> contortions we'd have to go through in the code. I don't mind at all if
> we're actually cleaning as we go (e.g., using types of the correct
> signedness, or preventing possible funny interactions). I'm just worried
> it will turn into a bunch of noisy casts.

Hmm, my memory is not what it was, ... ;-) However, I seem to recall that most of the changes were "improvements", with only a (relatively) few scattering of casts (behind existing macros - namely the OPTION macros). (Oh, wait, I think 'unused' parameters etc., was another problem area).

> The patch you showed seems like an improvement to the code, but I don't
> know if that would be the case for all of them. :)

Yes, I've had that patch (and others like it) hanging around for years! (perhaps it's time to dig through all those old branches)

ATB, Ramsay Jones