Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2016, #01; Thu, 2)
- From
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date
- Jun 4, 2016, 05:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160604051458.GA3149@glandium.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqvb1pzvfu.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:47:33PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes: > > > In fact, the parser doesn't even reject the one that is considered > > invalid (the first). > > My question was what the desired behaviour is, and if your "fix" > gives us that desired outcome.
>From my POV, the desired outcome from this patch series is that there is
no change of behavior, and Torsten's fix makes git://[example.com:123]:/path/to/repo urls handled the same before and after the patch series.
Whether that's the desired behavior is another topic, that we can, IMHO, leave for later.
Mike