Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2016, #01; Thu, 2)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 4, 2016, 16:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqinxozzuj.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160604051458.GA3149@glandium.org>
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> From my POV, the desired outcome from this patch series is that there is > no change of behavior, and Torsten's fix makes > git://[example.com:123]:/path/to/repo urls handled the same before and > after the patch series.
OK.
I somehow suspect nobody cares too much about what happens to the <scheme>://[<string>] syntax where [<string>] is not an IPv6 literal, but if a rewrite is meant to be a rewrite, it is very good that you two are aiming for bug-to-bug compatible behaviour.
Can we have a final submission to be queued? I'd rather not to squash things in to a topic that I wasn't heavily involved in its review discussion.
Thanks.