From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 05:14:58 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2016, #01; Thu, 2)
Message-ID: <20160604051458.GA3149@glandium.org>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqvb1pzvfu.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:47:33PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> 
> > In fact, the parser doesn't even reject the one that is considered
> > invalid (the first).
> 
> My question was what the desired behaviour is, and if your "fix"
> gives us that desired outcome.

>From my POV, the desired outcome from this patch series is that there is
no change of behavior, and Torsten's fix makes
git://[example.com:123]:/path/to/repo urls handled the same before and
after the patch series.

Whether that's the desired behavior is another topic, that we can,
IMHO, leave for later.

Mike