git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] tag: use pgp_verify_function in tag -v call

From
Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
Date
Apr 4, 2016, 04:12 UTC
Message-ID
<20160404041203.GE28933@LykOS>
In-Reply-To
<20160403045600.GD1519@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Show 39 quoted lines
> > diff --git a/builtin/verify-tag.c b/builtin/verify-tag.c
> > index f776778..8abc357 100644
> > --- a/builtin/verify-tag.c
> > +++ b/builtin/verify-tag.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> >  {
> >  	int i = 1, verbose = 0, had_error = 0;
> >  	unsigned flags = 0;
> > +	unsigned char sha1[20];
> > +	const char *name;
> >  	const struct option verify_tag_options[] = {
> >  		OPT__VERBOSE(&verbose, N_("print tag contents")),
> >  		OPT_BIT(0, "raw", &flags, N_("print raw gpg status output"), GPG_VERIFY_RAW),
> > @@ -46,8 +48,16 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> >  	if (verbose)
> >  		flags |= GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE;
> >  
> > -	while (i < argc)
> > -		if (pgp_verify_tag(argv[i++], flags))
> > +	while (i < argc) {
> > +		name = argv[i++];
> > +		if (get_sha1(name, sha1)) {
> > +			error("tag '%s' not found.", name);
> >  			had_error = 1;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (pgp_verify_tag(name, NULL, sha1, flags))
> > +			had_error = 1;
> > +
> > +	}
> 
> So this is a good example of the rippling I mentioned earlier.
> 
> As a side note, it might actually be an improvement for pgp_verify_tag
> to take a sha1 (so that git-tag is sure that it is verifying the same
> object that it is printing), but that refactoring should probably come
> separately, I think.
> 
> -Peff

Just to be sure, this refactoring is something we should still include in this set of patches, right? I think that otherwise we'd lose the desambigutaion that git tag -v does in this patch.

I also think that most of the rippling is gone if we use and adaptor as you suggested. Should I add a patch on top of this to support a sha1 as part for gpg_verify_tag()?

Thanks! -Santiago.

Previous: Santiago TorresNext: Jeff King
Message 21 of 24 in “tag: move PGP verification code to tag.c”
  1. 0/4 tag: move PGP verification code to tag.csantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 2, 2016
  2. 1/4 builtin/verify-tag.c: Ignore SIGPIPE on gpg-interfacesantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 2, 2016
  3. Jeff KingApr 3, 2016
  4. Johannes SixtApr 3, 2016
  5. Santiago TorresApr 3, 2016
  6. 2/4 t/t7030-verify-tag.sh: Adds validation for multiple tagssantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 2, 2016
  7. Jeff KingApr 3, 2016
  8. Eric SunshineApr 3, 2016
  9. Jeff KingApr 3, 2016
  10. Santiago TorresApr 3, 2016
  11. Eric SunshineApr 4, 2016
  12. Jeff KingApr 4, 2016
  13. 3/4 builtin/verify-tag: move verification code to tag.csantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 2, 2016
  14. Jeff KingApr 3, 2016
  15. Eric SunshineApr 3, 2016
  16. Eric SunshineApr 3, 2016
  17. Santiago TorresApr 3, 2016
  18. 4/4 tag: use pgp_verify_function in tag -v callsantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 2, 2016
  19. Jeff KingApr 3, 2016
  20. Santiago TorresApr 3, 2016
  21. Santiago TorresApr 4, 2016
  22. Jeff KingApr 4, 2016
  23. Santiago TorresApr 4, 2016
  24. Jeff KingApr 4, 2016

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.