Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] tag: use pgp_verify_function in tag -v call
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 3, 2016, 04:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160403045600.GD1519@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1459638975-17705-5-git-send-email-santiago@nyu.edu>
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 07:16:15PM -0400, santiago@nyu.edu wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c > index 1705c94..3dffdff 100644 > --- a/builtin/tag.c > +++ b/builtin/tag.c > @@ -65,9 +65,10 @@ static int list_tags(struct ref_filter *filter, struct ref_sorting *sorting, con > } > > typedef int (*each_tag_name_fn)(const char *name, const char *ref, > - const unsigned char *sha1); > + const unsigned char *sha1, unsigned flags);
I'm not sure it's a good idea to add a flags field here; most of the callbacks don't use it, and as you probably noticed, it makes the patch a lot noisier. It does let you directly use pgp_verify_tag like this:
> if (cmdmode == 'v') > - return for_each_tag_name(argv, verify_tag); > + return for_each_tag_name(argv, pgp_verify_tag, > + GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE);
but I think that is coupling too closely. What happens later when the public, multi-file pgp_verify_tag function changes its interface? Or we want to change our interface here, and it no longer matches pgp_verify_tag? The results ripple a lot further than they should.
I think you probably want to keep a simple adapter callback in this file, like:
int verify_tag(const char *name, const char *ref, const unsigned char *sha1)
{
return pgp_verify_tag(name, GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE));
}Show 30 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/verify-tag.c b/builtin/verify-tag.c
> index f776778..8abc357 100644
> --- a/builtin/verify-tag.c
> +++ b/builtin/verify-tag.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> {
> int i = 1, verbose = 0, had_error = 0;
> unsigned flags = 0;
> + unsigned char sha1[20];
> + const char *name;
> const struct option verify_tag_options[] = {
> OPT__VERBOSE(&verbose, N_("print tag contents")),
> OPT_BIT(0, "raw", &flags, N_("print raw gpg status output"), GPG_VERIFY_RAW),
> @@ -46,8 +48,16 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> if (verbose)
> flags |= GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE;
>
> - while (i < argc)
> - if (pgp_verify_tag(argv[i++], flags))
> + while (i < argc) {
> + name = argv[i++];
> + if (get_sha1(name, sha1)) {
> + error("tag '%s' not found.", name);
> had_error = 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (pgp_verify_tag(name, NULL, sha1, flags))
> + had_error = 1;
> +
> + }So this is a good example of the rippling I mentioned earlier.
As a side note, it might actually be an improvement for pgp_verify_tag to take a sha1 (so that git-tag is sure that it is verifying the same object that it is printing), but that refactoring should probably come separately, I think.
-Peff