Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Make "local" orthogonal to date format
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 2, 2015, 21:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150902212733.GA21612@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqfv2wmup7.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:29:08PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes: > > > In which case, should we just support it now? > > > > Normally I'd suggest banning controversial options on the basis that > > it's easier in the future to allow something that was previously banned > > than change the meaning of an options, but in this case I can't see any > > other meaning for these options than that described above. > > My usual stance is the same as yours, and I agree that there is no > other sane and useful behaviour for "relative-local" to do the same > as "relative".
That sounds fine to me. Then we don't have to worry about the error messages. ;)
-Peff